Connecticut

Acceleration Clause used in Connecticut foreclosure

Rudra Tamm v. Carey Gangitano et al
CV990175640S

Case Law
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STAMFORD - NORWALK, AT STAMFORD

No legal remedy in Connecticut

CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. MICHAEL L. BURTON
(AC 23975)

Case Law
APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT
81 Conn. App. 662; 841 A.2d 248; 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 72

December 3, 2003, Argued

No defense for borrower in Connecticut

United States of America Department of Agriculture v. David A. Vieaux
561215

Case Law
SUPERIOR COURT OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NEW LONDON, AT NEW LONDON
2004 Conn. Super. LEXIS 754

March 23, 2004, Decided

Reasonable Attorney Fees Collected in Connecticut

VORCELIA OLIPHANT, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER SIMBOSKI and REINER, REINER & BENDETT, P.C., Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03cv2038 (SRU)

Case Law
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Limit Foreclosure in a blanket mortgage in Connecticut

Case Law
AMRESCO NEW ENGLAND II, L.P., ET AL. v. DOMINIC COLOSSALE ET AL.
(AC 20259)

APPELLATE COURT OF CONNECTICUT
63 Conn. App. 49; 774 A.2d 1083; 2001 Conn. App. LEXIS 200
December 11, 2000, Argued